IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Chris Rupp Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1997-02-17 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Wilkes-Barre/Scranton Knights NAHL 5 0 1 1 0.200 0.0735 0.0756 0.2111 0.2173
2016-17 — EHL 26 5 9 14 0.538 0.1244 0.1237 — —
2017-18 New Jersey Rockets USPHL-Premier 44 18 17 35 0.795 0.1041 0.0960 0.2700 0.2489
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Framingham State D1 MASCAC SO 14 2 1 3 0.214
2019-20 Framingham State D3 MASCAC — 14 2 1 3 0.214
2018-19 Framingham State D1 MASCAC FR 20 0 3 3 0.150
2018-19 Framingham State D3 MASCAC — 20 0 3 3 0.150
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.09
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.15
2018-19 · Framingham State
+63.6% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

20%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#28081
Forward overall
#1280
Forward born in 1997

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Gideon Cooper
Albertus Magnus · 2018-19
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Ethan DeMumbrum
Salem State · 2021-22
0.259 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Cole Sanderson
Babson · 2017-18
0.300 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.