← New Search ↗ Social Card

Cole Sanderson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1997-02-14 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 New Jersey Rockets EHL 39 2 5 7 0.179 0.0263 0.0273 0.0880 0.0915
2016-17 New Jersey Rockets EHL 48 1 24 25 0.521 0.0762 0.0758 0.2553 0.2538
2017-18 New Jersey Rockets USPHL-Premier 33 11 16 27 0.818 0.0923 0.0850 0.2784 0.2565
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Babson D3 LittleEast SR 23 1 6 7 0.304
2020-21 Babson D1 JR 7 1 2 3 0.429
2020-21 Babson D3 LittleEast JR 7 1 2 3 0.429
2019-20 Babson D1 SO 15 0 3 3 0.200
2019-20 Babson D3 LittleEast SO 15 0 3 3 0.200
2018-19 Babson D1 FR 20 0 6 6 0.300
2018-19 Babson D3 LittleEast FR 20 0 6 6 0.300
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.08
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.30
2018-19 · Babson
+290.6% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

18%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#6937
Defenseman overall
#1322
Defenseman born in 1997

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Oswego · 2016-17
0.400 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Norbert · 2015-16
0.296 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
St. John Fisher · 2024-25
0.320 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.