← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kurt Black Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-02-10 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Vernon Vipers BCHL 2 0 0 0 0.000
2013-14 Chilliwack Chiefs BCHL 56 10 14 24 0.429 0.1651 0.1675 0.6237 0.6326
2014-15 Chilliwack Chiefs BCHL 56 18 27 45 0.804 0.3096 0.2996 1.1695 1.1316
2015-16 BCHL 51 19 25 44 0.863 0.3324 0.3038 1.2555 1.1476
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 St. Norbert D1 NCHA SR 28 21 16 37 1.321
2019-20 St. Norbert D3 NCHA SR 28 21 16 37 1.321
2018-19 St. Norbert D1 NCHA JR 30 13 11 24 0.800
2018-19 St. Norbert D3 NCHA JR 30 13 11 24 0.800
2017-18 St. Norbert D3 NCHA SO 31 9 4 13 0.419
2016-17 St. Norbert D3 NCHA FR 27 3 5 8 0.296
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.26
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.30
2016-17 · St. Norbert
+14.6% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#18300
Forward overall
#698
Forward born in 1995
#824
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.86 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Maine
0.39 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Westfield State · 2010-11
0.950 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Williams · 2013-14
0.880 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Worcester State · 2021-22
0.808 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.