IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kurt Black Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-02-10 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Vernon Vipers BCHL 2 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2013-14 Chilliwack Chiefs BCHL 56 10 14 24 0.429 0.1668 0.1692 0.6250 0.6339
2014-15 Chilliwack Chiefs BCHL 56 18 27 45 0.804 0.3128 0.3027 1.1719 1.1339
2015-16 — BCHL 51 19 25 44 0.863 0.3358 0.3069 1.2581 1.1499
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 St. Norbert D3 NCHA SR 28 21 16 37 1.321
2018-19 St. Norbert D3 NCHA JR 30 13 11 24 0.800
2017-18 St. Norbert D3 NCHA SO 31 9 4 13 0.419
2016-17 St. Norbert D3 NCHA FR 27 3 5 8 0.296
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.26
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.30
2016-17 · St. Norbert
+13.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#11221
Forward overall
#395
Forward born in 1995
#866
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ricky DeRosa
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.71 PPG
→ Penn State (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Average
NCAAe PPG
Dylan Walchuk
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.86 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG
Perry D'Arrisso
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.02 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
David Goodwin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.38 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

David Italiano
Williams · 2013-14
0.880 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Anders Grongstad
Worcester State · 2021-22
0.808 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Matt Carlson
Wilkes · 2021-22
0.840 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.