IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tommy Horn Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-02-06 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 — NAHL 34 5 2 7 0.206 0.0756 0.0773 0.2173 0.2220
2015-16 Johnstown Tomahawks NAHL 48 11 16 27 0.562 0.2067 0.2021 0.5937 0.5804
2016-17 Johnstown Tomahawks NAHL 39 9 16 25 0.641 0.2355 0.2174 0.6766 0.6246
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 SUNY Oswego D3 SUNYAC SO 7 0 0 0 0.000
2017-18 SUNY Oswego D3 SUNYAC FR 10 1 3 4 0.400
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.18
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.40
2017-18 · SUNY Oswego
+121.1% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#27126
Forward overall
#1120
Forward born in 1996
#2289
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
David Goodwin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Tommy Nolan
SUNY Cortland · 2013-14
0.625 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Nicholas Stevens
Wisconsin-Stout · 2023-24
0.826 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Markus Andrews
Saint Mary's (MN) · 2023-24
0.300 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.