IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

George Hansen Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1997-09-09 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Texas Jr. Brahmas NA3HL 45 6 36 42 0.933 0.1032 0.1078 — —
2016-17 Wilkes-Barre/Scranton Knights NAHL 6 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2017-18 Metro Jets NA3HL 40 10 33 43 1.075 0.1189 0.1122 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Gustavus Adolphus D3 MIAC GR 24 1 1 2 0.083
2021-22 Gustavus Adolphus D3 MIAC SR 23 1 3 4 0.174
2020-21 Gustavus Adolphus D1 — JR 5 0 0 0 0.000
2020-21 Gustavus Adolphus D3 MIAC JR 5 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Gustavus Adolphus D1 — SO 15 0 1 1 0.067
2019-20 Gustavus Adolphus D3 MIAC SO 15 0 1 1 0.067
2018-19 Gustavus Adolphus D1 — FR 10 0 1 1 0.100
2018-19 Gustavus Adolphus D3 MIAC FR 10 0 1 1 0.100
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.11
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.10
2018-19 · Gustavus Adolphus
-8.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

15%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#6601
Defenseman overall
#1280
Defenseman born in 1997

D1 Comparables

William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Patrick Koudys
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Benjamin Gallacher
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Kirk
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.