← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kimball Johnson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1999-06-23 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Lone Star Brahmas NAHL 3 0 0 0 0.000
2016-17 Lone Star Brahmas NAHL 4 0 0 0 0.000
2017-18 Lone Star Brahmas NAHL 47 5 8 13 0.277 0.0982 0.1024 0.2904 0.3028
2018-19 Lone Star Brahmas NAHL 55 5 12 17 0.309 0.1098 0.1096 0.3245 0.3238
2019-20 Minnesota Wilderness NAHL 49 8 19 27 0.551 0.1957 0.1957 0.5785 0.5785
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 Utica D3 UCHC 28 5 13 18 0.643
2022-23 Utica D3 UCHC 26 6 21 27 1.038
2021-22 St. Thomas D1 CCHA SO 23 2 6 8 0.348
2020-21 St. Thomas D3 FR 8 2 2 4 0.500
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.10
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.50
2020-21 · St. Thomas
+396.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

45%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
25%
Age-Out / Club
25%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#9400
Defenseman overall
#1869
Defenseman born in 1999
#3340
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.22 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.44 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.45 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ UConn (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ Providence (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Morrisville · 2014-15
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Brockport · 2014-15
1.080 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Fredonia · 2013-14
0.958 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.