IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Corbin Schiebel Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-06-30 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Fort Wayne Spacemen USPHL-Premier 30 11 7 18 0.600 0.0677 0.0677 0.2037 0.2037
2021-22 New Jersey Rockets NCDC 1 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2022-23 — NA3HL 36 7 11 18 0.500 0.0553 0.0547 0.1578 0.1561
2023-24 New Jersey Bears EHL 44 14 21 35 0.795 0.1165 0.1129 0.3896 0.3776
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Misericordia D3 MAC SO 24 7 5 12 0.500
2024-25 Misericordia D3 MAC — 21 4 2 6 0.286
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.08
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.29
2024-25 · Misericordia
+272.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

25%
NCAA D2/D3
5%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#26937
Forward overall
#1515
Forward born in 2003

D1 Comparables

Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Joel Gaulrapp
Wisconsin-Superior · 2005-06
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Victor Tracy
Fredonia · 2016-17
0.630 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Brendan Schulte
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2018-19
0.235 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.