IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Victor Tracy Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-06-12 Country: Sweden
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 Örebro HK U20 SHL-J20 1 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2015-16 Kemptville 73's CCHL 61 17 18 35 0.574 0.1638 0.1598 0.4442 0.4335
2016-17 Kemptville 73's CCHL 60 17 19 36 0.600 0.1712 0.1581 0.4645 0.4289
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Fredonia D3 — JR 25 8 17 25 1.000
2018-19 Fredonia D3 — SO 27 10 10 20 0.741
2017-18 Fredonia D3 — FR 27 8 9 17 0.630
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.14
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.63
2017-18 · Fredonia
+363.3% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#24666
Forward overall
#1039
Forward born in 1996

D1 Comparables

Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Bob Kinne
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cody Marooney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Bradley Duwe
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jayson Angus
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.66 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Brayden Kolisniak
Wisconsin-Superior · 2007-08
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Jordan Neduzak
Wisconsin-Superior · 2012-13
0.429 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Amit Grumet-Morris
Becker · 2010-11
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.