← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jordan Neduzak Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1992-07-16 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2008-09 Winkler Flyers MJHL 44 16 8 24 0.545 0.1050 0.1193 0.3440 0.3909
2009-10 Winkler Flyers MJHL 55 11 18 29 0.527 0.1015 0.1108 0.3325 0.3629
2010-11 Winkler Flyers MJHL 60 18 37 55 0.917 0.1765 0.1841 0.5781 0.6029
2011-12 Winkler Flyers MJHL 62 29 42 71 1.145 0.2205 0.2189 0.7222 0.7168
2012-13 MJHL 59 22 37 59 1.000 0.1925 0.1815 0.6306 0.5946
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2016-17 Wisconsin-Superior D3 BigTen SR 26 10 11 21 0.808
2015-16 Wisconsin-Superior D3 BigTen JR 26 12 7 19 0.731
2014-15 Wisconsin-Superior D3 BigTen SO 26 9 6 15 0.577
2013-14 Wisconsin-Superior D3 BigTen FR 28 7 5 12 0.429
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.17
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.43
2013-14 · Wisconsin-Superior
+154.8% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#18118
Forward overall
#693
Forward born in 1992
#129
in MJHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

New England College · 2024-25
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Geneseo · 2015-16
0.654 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Cortland · 2015-16
0.680 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.