IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Nick DeVito Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-07-05 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Wellington Dukes OJHL 48 13 13 26 0.542 0.1627 0.1577 0.3708 0.3594
2015-16 Wellington Dukes OJHL 12 2 6 8 0.667 0.2003 0.1831 0.4564 0.4171
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 SUNY Morrisville D1 — SR 25 6 16 22 0.880
2019-20 SUNY Morrisville D3 SUNYAC SR 25 6 16 22 0.880
2018-19 SUNY Morrisville D1 — JR 25 12 20 32 1.280
2018-19 SUNY Morrisville D3 SUNYAC JR 25 12 20 32 1.280
2017-18 SUNY Morrisville D3 SUNYAC SO 25 12 12 24 0.960
2016-17 SUNY Morrisville D3 SUNYAC FR 25 6 9 15 0.600
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.15
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.60
2016-17 · SUNY Morrisville
+305.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#30570
Forward overall
#1224
Forward born in 1995

D1 Comparables

Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Riley Christensen
St. Norbert · 2014-15
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Declan Gunovski
Fredonia · 2010-11
0.375 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Ryan Burnett
SUNY Geneseo · 2017-18
0.556 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.