← New Search ↗ Social Card

Gunnarwolfe Fontaine Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2000-09-16 Country: USA
2020 NHL Draft Round 7, Pick #202  ·  Nashville Predators Nashville Predators
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Chicago Steel USHL 60 20 23 43 0.717 0.4406 0.4501 2.1115 2.1571
2019-20 Chicago Steel USHL 45 26 31 57 1.267 0.7786 0.7786 3.7320 3.7320
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Ohio State D1 BigTen 40 17 23 40 1.000
2023-24 Northeastern D1 HockeyEast SR 36 8 19 27 0.750
2022-23 Northeastern D1 HockeyEast JR 35 10 20 30 0.857
2021-22 Northeastern D1 HockeyEast SO 39 8 17 25 0.641
2020-21 Northeastern D1 HockeyEast FR 21 6 9 15 0.714
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.39
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.71
2020-21 · Northeastern
+85.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

98%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
2%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#3461
Forward overall
#142
Forward born in 2000
#102
in USHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ New Hampshire (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.81 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.50 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.69 PPG
→ Michigan (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.77 D1 FR PPG)
0.33 Strong
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.98 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.90 D1 FR PPG)
0.42 Elite
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Albertus Magnus · 2017-18
0.720 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Buffalo State · 2022-23
1.120 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
UMass Boston · 2015-16
1.125 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.