← New Search ↗ Social Card

Colin Bilek Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1997-06-04 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Rochester Jr. Americans USPHL-Premier-Classic 26 9 11 20 0.769 0.2159 0.2286 0.6335 0.6709
2016-17 Northeast Generals NAHL 60 18 22 40 0.667 0.2641 0.2613 0.7000 0.6927
2017-18 Northeast Generals NAHL 57 18 32 50 0.877 0.3475 0.3267 0.9210 0.8658
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Army D1 AHA SR 34 11 20 31 0.912
2020-21 Army D1 AHA JR 22 18 7 25 1.136
2020-21 Army West Point D1 AHA JR 22 18 7 25 1.136
2019-20 Army D1 AHA SO 33 7 13 20 0.606
2019-20 Army West Point D1 AHA SO 33 7 13 20 0.606
2018-19 Army D1 AHA FR 38 7 10 17 0.447
2018-19 Army West Point D1 AHA FR 38 7 10 17 0.447
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.26
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.45
2018-19 · Army
+73.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

42%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
50%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#16556
Forward overall
#730
Forward born in 1997

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ RIT (0.65 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Strong
NCAAe PPG
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Maine
0.39 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Plymouth State · 2017-18
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Scholastica · 2004-05
1.192 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Trine · 2018-19
0.929 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.