IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Connor Koviak Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1997-04-11 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 — NAHL 54 13 18 31 0.574 0.2132 0.2094 0.6079 0.5970
2017-18 St. Cloud Norsemen NAHL 60 19 12 31 0.517 0.1919 0.1790 0.5471 0.5103
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Wisconsin-Eau Claire D3 WIAC SR 23 3 3 6 0.261
2020-21 Wisconsin-Eau Claire D3 BigTen JR 8 1 1 2 0.250
2019-20 Wisconsin-Eau Claire D3 BigTen SO 22 1 5 6 0.273
2018-19 Wisconsin-Eau Claire D3 BigTen FR 25 2 5 7 0.280
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.16
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.28
2018-19 · Wisconsin-Eau Claire
+71.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

8%
NCAA D1
40%
NCAA D2/D3
50%
Age-Out / Club
2%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#20146
Forward overall
#836
Forward born in 1997
#1906
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Bradley Duwe
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Bob Kinne
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Clint Carlisle
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.78 PPG
→ Army (0.52 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Nick Perruccio
Neumann · 2012-13
0.545 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Jeff Thompson
Connecticut College · 2015-16
0.636 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Evan Michalchuk
Manhattanville · 2007-08
0.526 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.