IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Nick Perruccio Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1992-04-15 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2008-09 Bramalea Blues OJHL 5 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2009-10 Toronto Patriots OJHL 48 17 25 42 0.875 0.2445 0.2571 0.6038 0.6349
2010-11 Toronto Patriots OJHL 50 25 40 65 1.300 0.3632 0.3650 0.8971 0.9016
2011-12 — OJHL 46 32 31 63 1.370 0.3827 0.3677 0.9452 0.9082
2012-13 Georgetown Raiders OJHL 48 17 28 45 0.938 0.2619 0.2386 0.6470 0.5894
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2016-17 Neumann D3 MAC SR 27 6 17 23 0.852
2015-16 Neumann D3 MAC JR 20 5 8 13 0.650
2014-15 Neumann D3 MAC SO 22 4 11 15 0.682
2013-14 Neumann D3 MAC FR 22 4 8 12 0.545
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.25
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.55
2013-14 · Neumann
+119.6% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#8932
Forward overall
#385
Forward born in 1992
#333
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Bradley Duwe
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Clint Carlisle
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.78 PPG
→ Army (0.52 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Average
NCAAe PPG
Bob Kinne
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Brodie Tutton
SUNY Geneseo · 2014-15
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Adam Martinez
SUNY Potsdam · 2007-08
0.476 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Anthony Bohn
St. Mary's · 2005-06
1.080 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.