IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tate Singleton Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-09-05 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 New Jersey Jr. Titans NAHL 56 20 27 47 0.839 0.3084 0.3092 0.8871 0.8895
2018-19 Central Illinois Flying Aces USHL 53 22 15 37 0.698 0.4118 0.3789 2.0948 1.9273
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Ohio State D1 BigTen SR 40 11 16 27 0.675
2021-22 Ohio State D1 BigTen JR 37 10 5 15 0.405
2020-21 Ohio State D1 BigTen SO 27 6 5 11 0.407
2019-20 Ohio State D1 BigTen FR 36 6 11 17 0.472
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.30
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.47
2019-20 · Ohio State
+57.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

82%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
10%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#9870
Forward overall
#440
Forward born in 1998

D1 Comparables

Jonathan Davis
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
A.J. Reid
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.18 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Emil Romig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Sean Gaffney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.14 PPG
→ UConn (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jared VanWormer
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.27 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Nicholas Cyprian
Chatham · 2021-22
0.880 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Dylan Clarke
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2006-07
1.267 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Niko Schoner
Canton · 2022-23
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.