← New Search ↗ Social Card

Michael Talbot Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1997-10-12 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Anoka High USHS-MN 25 16 13 29 1.160 0.1429 0.1400 0.2818 0.2762
2016-17 Minot Minotauros NAHL 44 11 5 16 0.364 0.1292 0.1301 0.3817 0.3845
2017-18 Minot Minotauros NAHL 49 9 19 28 0.571 0.2030 0.1944 0.5999 0.5746
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 St. Scholastica D3 MIAC SR 23 7 8 15 0.652
2020-21 St. Scholastica D1 JR 15 5 12 17 1.133
2020-21 St. Scholastica D3 JR 15 5 12 17 1.133
2019-20 St. Scholastica D1 SO 24 6 5 11 0.458
2019-20 St. Scholastica D3 SO 24 6 5 11 0.458
2018-19 St. Scholastica D1 FR 25 7 3 10 0.400
2018-19 St. Scholastica D3 FR 25 7 3 10 0.400
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.14
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.40
2018-19 · St. Scholastica
+177.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

55%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
42%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#25201
Forward overall
#1135
Forward born in 1997

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Plattsburgh · 2000-01
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Concordia · 2021-22
0.846 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Nichols · 2024-25
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.