IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Stephen Halliday Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-07-02 Country: Canada
2022 · Round 4, Pick #104  ·  Ottawa Senators Ottawa Senators
Signed Professionally

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 — OJHL 3 0 2 2 0.667 0.1634 0.1913 0.4590 0.5373
2018-19 — USHL 55 10 24 34 0.618 0.3647 0.4052 1.8567 2.0630
2019-20 — USHL 46 13 25 38 0.826 0.4873 0.4873 2.4811 2.4811
2020-21 — USHL 52 10 38 48 0.923 0.5445 0.5445 2.7724 2.7724
2021-22 — USHL 62 35 60 95 1.532 0.9039 0.8682 4.6021 4.4204
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 Ohio State D1 BigTen — 38 10 26 36 0.947
2022-23 Ohio State D1 BigTen — 40 9 32 41 1.025
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.64
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
1.02
2022-23 · Ohio State
+61.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

⭐ Elite profile — high probability of D1 placement; comparable to top-end prospects
92%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
8%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

D1 Comparables

Justin Kloos
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.61 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.78 D1 FR PPG)
0.93 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Zach Stepan
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.39 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.60 D1 FR PPG)
0.81 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Vinnie Hinostroza
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.30 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.94 D1 FR PPG)
0.76 Elite
NCAAe PPG
Jake Guentzel
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.22 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.92 D1 FR PPG)
0.73 Elite
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Arkhip Ledenkov
St. Scholastica · 2018-19
1.636 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Neil Trimm
Neumann · 2003-04
1.800 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Filimon Ledenkov
St. Scholastica · 2018-19
1.636 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.