← New Search ↗ Social Card

Josh Norman Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-05-18 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Johnstown Tomahawks NAHL 42 6 6 12 0.286 0.1015 0.1053 0.3000 0.3111
2017-18 Springfield Jr. Blues NAHL 10 0 1 1 0.100 0.0355 0.0351 0.1050 0.1037
2018-19 Rockland Nationals CCHL 51 17 19 36 0.706 0.1531 0.1414 0.5464 0.5048
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 Lake Forest D3 NCHA 2 0 0 0 0.000
2022-23 Lake Forest D3 NCHA 9 0 0 0 0.000
2021-22 Lake Forest D3 NCHA 11 2 2 4 0.364
2019-20 St. Thomas D3 FR 4 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

35%
NCAA D1
10%
NCAA D2/D3
55%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#38281
Forward overall
#1975
Forward born in 1998

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

New England · 2018-19
0.727 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Stout · 2015-16
0.741 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Manhattanville · 2007-08
0.526 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.