IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Logan Ommen Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1999-07-25 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Janesville Jets NAHL 3 1 1 2 0.667 0.2449 0.2685 0.7037 0.7715
2017-18 Janesville Jets NAHL 47 3 9 12 0.255 0.0938 0.0982 0.2695 0.2822
2018-19 Janesville Jets NAHL 52 6 14 20 0.385 0.1413 0.1416 0.4059 0.4068
2019-20 — NAHL 36 4 7 11 0.306 0.1123 0.1123 0.3226 0.3226
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 St. Thomas D3 CCHA FR 4 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

35%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
30%
Age-Out / Club
30%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#40968
Forward overall
#2302
Forward born in 1999
#4386
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Josh Erickson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Zach Saar
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Penn State (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ben Greiner
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Spezia
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Matt Pohlkamp
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Nick Yzaguirre
Utica · 2016-17
0.350 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Taylor Brierley
Wilkes · 2015-16
1.042 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Kevin Paganini
Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2018-19
0.625 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.