IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kevin Paganini Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1999-08-23 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 New Hampshire Jr. Monarchs NCDC 46 10 20 30 0.652 0.1838 0.1839 0.5280 0.5283
2019-20 New Hampshire Jr. Monarchs NCDC 45 19 21 40 0.889 0.2505 0.2505 0.7197 0.7197
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 Milwaukee School of Engineering D3 NCHA SR 27 4 6 10 0.370
2022-23 Milwaukee School of Engineering D3 NCHA JR 25 8 9 17 0.680
2021-22 Milwaukee School of Engineering D3 NCHA SO 5 1 5 6 1.200
2020-21 Milwaukee School of Engineering D3 — FR 16 6 4 10 0.625
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.16
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.62
2020-21 · Milwaukee School of Engineering
+297.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

48%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
38%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#17466
Forward overall
#653
Forward born in 1999
#152
in NCDC

D1 Comparables

Conor Andrle
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Army (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Average
NCAAe PPG
Conor Lemirande
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Miami (0.08 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jake Wood
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ RPI (0.24 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Erik Baskin
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.44 PPG
→ Air Force (0.66 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Zach Szajner
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Peyton Frantti
St. Norbert · 2016-17
0.871 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Jarrod Fitzpatrick
Utica · 2014-15
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Tanner Spink
SUNY Oswego · 2015-16
0.591 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.