← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kevin Paganini Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1999-08-23 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 New Hampshire Jr. Monarchs NCDC 46 10 20 30 0.652 0.2659 0.2660 0.5242 0.5245
2019-20 New Hampshire Jr. Monarchs NCDC 45 19 21 40 0.889 0.3624 0.3624 0.7145 0.7145
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 Milwaukee School of Engineering D3 NCHA SR 27 4 6 10 0.370
2022-23 Milwaukee School of Engineering D3 NCHA JR 25 8 9 17 0.680
2021-22 Milwaukee School of Engineering D3 NCHA SO 5 1 5 6 1.200
2020-21 Milwaukee School of Engineering D1 NCHA FR 16 6 4 10 0.625
2020-21 Milwaukee School of Engineering D3 NCHA FR 16 6 4 10 0.625
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.23
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.62
2020-21 · Milwaukee School of Engineering
+174.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

22%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
40%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#6183
Forward overall
#258
Forward born in 1999
#109
in NCDC

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ Army (0.67 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ RPI (0.24 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.88 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.61 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.56 PPG
→ Vermont (0.47 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Fitchburg State · 2023-24
1.560 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Chatham · 2017-18
0.520 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Oswego · 2018-19
0.684 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.