← New Search ↗ Social Card

Shane Bull Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1999-09-03 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Haliburton County Huskies OJHL 5 0 1 1 0.200 0.0490 0.0550 0.1377 0.1545
2016-17 Haliburton County Huskies OJHL 49 6 11 17 0.347 0.0850 0.0916 0.2388 0.2573
2017-18 Haliburton County Huskies OJHL 54 20 21 41 0.759 0.1861 0.1915 0.5228 0.5381
2018-19 Haliburton County Huskies OJHL 54 15 26 41 0.759 0.1861 0.1824 0.5228 0.5125
2019-20 Corpus Christi IceRays NAHL 31 10 7 17 0.548 0.2015 0.2015 0.5788 0.5788
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 SUNY Oswego D3 SUNYAC JR 26 22 20 42 1.615
2022-23 SUNY Oswego D3 SUNYAC SO 27 9 18 27 1.000
2021-22 SUNY Oswego D3 SUNYAC FR 19 2 11 13 0.684
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.16
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.68
2021-22 · SUNY Oswego
+329.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

38%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
25%
Age-Out / Club
32%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#22253
Forward overall
#1101
Forward born in 1999

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Army (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ RPI (0.24 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.79 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Strong
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ Army (0.67 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Geneseo · 2021-22
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Norbert · 2006-07
0.548 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Adrian · 2017-18
1.103 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.