← New Search ↗ Social Card

Shane Bull Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1999-09-03 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Haliburton County Huskies OJHL 5 0 1 1 0.200 0.0559 0.0627 0.1380 0.1549
2016-17 Haliburton County Huskies OJHL 49 6 11 17 0.347 0.0969 0.1044 0.2394 0.2579
2017-18 Haliburton County Huskies OJHL 54 20 21 41 0.759 0.2121 0.2183 0.5240 0.5393
2018-19 Haliburton County Huskies OJHL 54 15 26 41 0.759 0.2121 0.2079 0.5240 0.5137
2019-20 Corpus Christi IceRays NAHL 31 10 7 17 0.548 0.2036 0.2036 0.5806 0.5806
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 SUNY Oswego D3 SUNYAC JR 26 22 20 42 1.615
2022-23 SUNY Oswego D3 SUNYAC SO 27 9 18 27 1.000
2021-22 SUNY Oswego D3 SUNYAC FR 19 2 11 13 0.684
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.18
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.68
2021-22 · SUNY Oswego
+277.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

12%
NCAA D1
18%
NCAA D2/D3
30%
Age-Out / Club
38%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#17091
Forward overall
#634
Forward born in 1999

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ RPI (0.24 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Miami (0.08 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.44 PPG
→ Air Force (0.66 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Army (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Adrian · 2017-18
1.103 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
UMass Dartmouth · 2010-11
0.778 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Elmira · 2010-11
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.