IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Owen Power Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2002-11-22 Country: Canada
2021 NHL Draft Round 1, Pick #1  ·  Buffalo Sabres Buffalo Sabres
Signed Professionally

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Chicago Steel USHL 58 11 14 25 0.431 0.2650 0.2996 1.2699 1.4358
2019-20 Chicago Steel USHL 45 12 28 40 0.889 0.5464 0.5464 2.6188 2.6188
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Michigan D1 BigTen SO 33 3 29 32 0.970
2020-21 Michigan D1 BigTen FR 26 3 13 16 0.615
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.28
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.62
2020-21 · Michigan
+117.6% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

65%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
35%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

D1 Comparables

Charles Manley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ RPI (0.08 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Bliss
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Cornell (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Fortunato
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Boston University (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Keegan Ford
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Wisconsin (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Jack Glover
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Connor Armour
Adrian · 2011-12
1.357 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Erik Caron
St. Michael's College · 2001-02
1.280 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Kyle Gallegos
Tufts · 2008-09
1.150 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.