IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Trevor Adams Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1999-08-19 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Amarillo Wranglers NAHL 2 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2017-18 Salmon Arm Silverbacks BCHL 55 13 13 26 0.473 0.1821 0.1895 0.6879 0.7160
2018-19 Salmon Arm Silverbacks BCHL 55 17 24 41 0.746 0.2872 0.2834 1.0849 1.0707
2019-20 — BCHL 49 8 11 19 0.388 0.1494 0.1494 0.5644 0.5644
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Union D1 ECAC — 0 0 0 0 0.000
2021-22 Union D1 ECAC — 13 0 2 2 0.154
2020-21 Union D1 ECAC — 0 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

50%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
22%
Age-Out / Club
22%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#29316
Forward overall
#1533
Forward born in 1999

D1 Comparables

C.J. Reuschlein
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ Army (0.67 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Max McHugh
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.88 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.61 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Jake Wood
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ RPI (0.24 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Judd Peterson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Kevin Irwin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.56 PPG
→ Vermont (0.47 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Joel Covelli
Colby · 2003-04
1.042 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Shane Wheeler
St. Norbert · 2005-06
0.903 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Jacob Ratcliffe
Westfield State · 2016-17
0.846 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.