← New Search ↗ Social Card

Nick Woodward Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1998-06-16 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Coulee Region Chill NAHL 3 0 0 0 0.000
2017-18 Bismarck Bobcats NAHL 35 1 2 3 0.086 0.0340 0.0337 0.0900 0.0892
2018-19 Amarillo Wranglers NAHL 17 1 0 1 0.059 0.0233 0.0221 0.0617 0.0584
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Augsburg D3 MIAC GR 27 5 11 16 0.593
2021-22 Augsburg D3 MIAC SR 30 5 5 10 0.333
2020-21 Augsburg D1 JR 5 0 2 2 0.400
2020-21 Augsburg D3 MIAC JR 5 0 2 2 0.400
2019-20 Augsburg D1 SO 25 0 4 4 0.160
2019-20 Augsburg D3 MIAC SO 25 0 4 4 0.160
2018-19 Augsburg D1 FR 14 0 2 2 0.143
2018-19 Augsburg D3 MIAC FR 14 0 2 2 0.143
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.03
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.14
2018-19 · Augsburg
+349.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

22%
NCAA D1
12%
NCAA D2/D3
65%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#29993
Defenseman overall
#3532
Defenseman born in 1998
#7053
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Saint Mary's (MN) · 2023-24
0.273 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Fredonia · 2012-13
0.067 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
UMass Boston · 2022-23
0.188 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.