IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jack Ford Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-06-08 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 New Jersey Jr. Titans NAHL 27 5 11 16 0.593 0.2200 0.2200 0.6274 0.6274
2021-22 — NAHL 38 6 10 16 0.421 0.1564 0.1561 0.4459 0.4450
2022-23 New Jersey Rockets NCDC 19 3 3 6 0.316 0.0890 0.0848 0.2557 0.2436
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 UMass Boston D3 — JR 26 1 4 5 0.192
2024-25 UMass Boston D3 NEHC SO 19 3 3 6 0.316
2023-24 UMass Boston D3 NEHC FR 16 1 2 3 0.188
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.10
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.19
2023-24 · UMass Boston
+93.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

18%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#32622
Forward overall
#1474
Forward born in 2002

D1 Comparables

Bob Kinne
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Cody Marooney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Bradley Duwe
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jayson Angus
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.66 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Trace Strahle
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2012-13
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Spencer Sasenbury
Canton · 2024-25
0.846 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Jack Brown
Bethel · 2021-22
0.440 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.