← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kyle Hallbauer Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1997-03-02 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Collingwood Blues OJHL 52 15 29 44 0.846 0.2074 0.1975 0.5826 0.5547
2017-18 Lone Star Brahmas NAHL 57 7 25 32 0.561 0.2063 0.1913 0.5926 0.5495
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 RPI D1 ECAC 35 2 11 13 0.371
2021-22 RPI D1 ECAC 39 2 5 7 0.179
2020-21 RPI D1 ECAC 0 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 RPI D1 ECAC SO 33 0 5 5 0.151
2019-20 Rensselaer D1 SO 33 0 5 5 0.151
2018-19 RPI D1 ECAC FR 30 3 8 11 0.367
2018-19 Rensselaer D1 FR 30 3 8 11 0.367
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.18
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.37
2018-19 · RPI
+100.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

52%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
42%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#5035
Defenseman overall
#1049
Defenseman born in 1997

D1 Comparables

QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

St. Scholastica · 2005-06
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Scholastica · 2007-08
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Southern Maine · 2012-13
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.