IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Diarmad DiMurro Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1999-05-02 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Philadelphia Rebels NAHL 49 4 24 28 0.571 0.2099 0.2173 0.6031 0.6245
2018-19 Trail Smoke Eaters BCHL 58 4 31 35 0.603 0.2325 0.2260 0.8781 0.8535
2019-20 Trail Smoke Eaters BCHL 57 6 32 38 0.667 0.2569 0.2569 0.9702 0.9702
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 SUNY Geneseo D3 SUNYAC SR 24 2 10 12 0.500
2023-24 SUNY Geneseo D3 SUNYAC SR 17 0 8 8 0.471
2022-23 SUNY Geneseo D3 SUNYAC JR 21 1 7 8 0.381
2021-22 RIT D1 AHA SO 11 1 0 1 0.091
2020-21 RIT D1 AHA FR 19 1 2 3 0.158
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.21
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.16
2020-21 · RIT
-24.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

38%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
10%
Age-Out / Club
50%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#5069
Defenseman overall
#1151
Defenseman born in 1999

D1 Comparables

Christopher Dienes
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Jared Kolquist
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Merrimack (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Victor Björkung
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Tucker Poolman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.44 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.45 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Dan Molenaar
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Shane Baker
Skidmore · 2023-24
0.704 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Mike Fiume
Neumann · 2002-03
1.040 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Ross Enmark
Curry · 2004-05
1.308 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.