IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Shane Baker Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-04-21 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Boston Jr. Bruins NCDC 47 13 12 25 0.532 0.2169 0.2360 0.4275 0.4651
2022-23 Boston Jr. Bruins NCDC 50 18 21 39 0.780 0.3180 0.3327 0.6270 0.6559
2023-24 Cranbrook Bucks BCHL 11 1 1 2 0.182 0.0700 0.0683 0.2646 0.2580
2024-25 Cranbrook Bucks BCHL 53 12 16 28 0.528 0.2036 0.1883 0.7688 0.7110
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Skidmore D3 SUNYAC FR 27 10 9 19 0.704
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.12
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.70
2025-26 · Skidmore
+485.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

12%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
52%
Age-Out / Club
28%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#18131
Forward overall
#916
Forward born in 2004

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Hunter Hayes
St. Olaf · 2024-25
0.708 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Anthony Iacullo
Saint Anselm · 2017-18
0.655 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Kyle Gattelaro
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2013-14
0.893 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.