IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Roberts Baranovskis Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1997-08-27 Country: Latvia
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Shreveport Mudbugs NAHL 56 9 17 26 0.464 0.1724 0.1640 0.4916 0.4678
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Aurora D3 NCHA SR 23 5 12 17 0.739
2020-21 Aurora D3 NCHA JR 11 0 6 6 0.545
2019-20 Aurora D3 NCHA SO 26 4 6 10 0.385
2018-19 Aurora D3 NCHA FR 27 6 14 20 0.741
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.14
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.74
2018-19 · Aurora
+427.6% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

5%
NCAA D1
40%
NCAA D2/D3
55%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#24027
Forward overall
#1042
Forward born in 1997
#2547
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Jayson Angus
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.66 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cody Marooney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Doucet
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.73 PPG
→ Air Force (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ian Miller
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Liam Lawson
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2016-17
0.640 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Adam Orn
Saint John's · 2015-16
0.438 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Dave Lewandowski
Wentworth · 2004-05
0.857 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.