IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Adam Orn Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1995-09-23 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Mason City Toros NA3HL 40 2 19 21 0.525 0.0633 0.0630 0.1658 0.1651
2015-16 Mason City Toros NA3HL 46 14 35 49 1.065 0.1284 0.1216 0.3365 0.3186
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Saint John's D3 — SR 26 2 10 12 0.462
2018-19 Saint John's D3 — JR 26 0 7 7 0.269
2017-18 Saint John's D3 — SO 22 2 3 5 0.227
2016-17 Saint John's D3 — FR 16 1 6 7 0.438
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.09
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.44
2016-17 · Saint John's
+372.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#12065
Defenseman overall
#1612
Defenseman born in 1995
#1147
in NA3HL

D1 Comparables

Jake Flynn
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ UConn (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Patrick Koudys
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dylan Zink
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.62 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Kirk
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.19 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Trevor Turner
New England College · 2005-06
0.714 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
David Becker
Bethel · 2014-15
0.286 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Tanner Shaw
Hobart · 2014-15
0.407 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.