IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Eric Huss Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1999-03-16 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Odessa Jackalopes NAHL 53 6 16 22 0.415 0.1525 0.1569 0.4381 0.4508
2018-19 — NAHL 56 6 10 16 0.286 0.1050 0.1033 0.3016 0.2969
2019-20 Lone Star Brahmas NAHL 53 6 37 43 0.811 0.2981 0.2981 0.8563 0.8563
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 Army D1 AHA SR 15 0 1 1 0.067
2022-23 Army D1 AHA JR 26 1 1 2 0.077
2021-22 Army D1 AHA SO 14 3 2 5 0.357
2020-21 Army D1 AHA FR 1 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

25%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
12%
Age-Out / Club
55%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#25015
Forward overall
#1270
Forward born in 1999
#1988
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Ben Ostlie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
Stanislav Dzakhov
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG
William Messa
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Northeastern
0.12 No data
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Alexander Dahl
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jake Adkins
UMass Boston · 2018-19
0.200 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Arvega Hovsepyan
Salve Regina · 2022-23
1.385 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Jim Jensen
Augsburg · 2006-07
0.962 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.