IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Anthony Firriolo Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1998-07-03 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Collingwood Blues OJHL 51 4 18 22 0.431 0.1057 0.1077 0.2970 0.3026
2017-18 — NAHL 53 2 17 19 0.358 0.1317 0.1309 0.3784 0.3761
2018-19 Corpus Christi IceRays NAHL 58 6 34 40 0.690 0.2534 0.2405 0.7280 0.6911
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Army D1 AHA SR 36 5 24 29 0.806
2021-22 Army D1 AHA JR 35 9 12 21 0.600
2020-21 Army D1 AHA SO 22 5 8 13 0.591
2019-20 Army D1 AHA FR 30 3 9 12 0.400
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.19
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.40
2019-20 · Army
+115.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

52%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
40%
Age-Out / Club
2%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#6789
Defenseman overall
#1377
Defenseman born in 1998

D1 Comparables

Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Benjamin Gallacher
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Mike Wilson
Worcester State · 2018-19
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Alex Porrier
Johnson & Wales · 2010-11
0.654 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Luke Radetic
St. Thomas · 2017-18
0.885 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.