← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brendan White Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-08-02 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 NAHL 41 2 9 11 0.268 0.0953 0.0951 0.2817 0.2812
2018-19 NAHL 12 0 2 2 0.167 0.0592 0.0564 0.1750 0.1668
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 New England College D3 LittleEast SR 22 1 1 2 0.091
2021-22 New England College D3 LittleEast JR 21 2 4 6 0.286
2020-21 New England College D1 SO 5 1 0 1 0.200
2020-21 New England College D3 LittleEast SO 5 1 0 1 0.200
2019-20 New England College D1 FR 14 0 3 3 0.214
2019-20 New England College D3 LittleEast FR 14 0 3 3 0.214
2017-18 Stonehill D2 SR 16 1 5 6 0.375
2016-17 Stonehill D2 JR 12 0 2 2 0.167
2015-16 Stonehill D2 SO 24 3 8 11 0.458
2014-15 Stonehill D2 FR 22 2 6 8 0.364

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

32%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
60%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#50367
Forward overall
#2762
Forward born in 1998
#5762
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Cortland · 2002-03
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Stevenson · 2021-22
0.538 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Arcadia · 2021-22
0.385 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.