← New Search ↗ Social Card

John Musella Jr. Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-08-05 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Northeast Generals NA3HL 15 4 3 7 0.467 0.0562 0.0562 0.1474 0.1474
2020-21 Northeast Generals NAHL 34 2 7 9 0.265 0.0983 0.0983 0.2803 0.2803
2021-22 NAHL 19 2 4 6 0.316 0.1173 0.1121 0.3344 0.3197
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Stevenson D3 MAC SR 27 11 26 37 1.370
2024-25 Stevenson D3 MAC JR 26 3 5 8 0.308
2023-24 Stevenson D3 MAC SO 27 10 13 23 0.852
2022-23 Stevenson D3 MAC FR 26 4 10 14 0.538
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.10
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.54
2022-23 · Stevenson
+460.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

10%
NCAA D1
32%
NCAA D2/D3
57%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#33026
Forward overall
#1372
Forward born in 2001

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.66 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Strong
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Utica · 2007-08
0.375 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Suffolk · 2018-19
0.429 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Brockport · 2015-16
0.304 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.