← New Search ↗ Social Card

Nathan Solis Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2000-09-06 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Janesville Jets NAHL 29 2 3 5 0.172 0.0633 0.0698 0.1820 0.2007
2018-19 Soo Eagles NOJHL 28 8 22 30 1.071 0.1789 0.1857 0.4460 0.4630
2019-20 NAHL 39 4 6 10 0.256 0.0942 0.0942 0.2706 0.2706
2020-21 Richmond Generals USPHL-Premier 27 14 26 40 1.482 0.1938 0.1938 0.5028 0.5028
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Saint Mary's (MN) D3 MIAC SR 22 6 12 18 0.818
2023-24 Saint Mary's (MN) D3 MIAC JR 14 1 5 6 0.429
2022-23 Saint Mary's (MN) D3 MIAC SO 17 2 5 7 0.412
2021-22 Saint Mary's (MN) D3 MIAC FR 19 3 4 7 0.368
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.12
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.37
2021-22 · Saint Mary's (MN)
+208.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

35%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
65%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#14979
Forward overall
#653
Forward born in 2000

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Michigan State (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.54 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.77 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Strong
NCAAe PPG
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.12 PPG
→ Boston College (0.72 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Army (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Williams · 2012-13
0.591 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Neumann · 2003-04
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
New England College · 2001-02
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.