IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

C.J. Shugart Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1994-09-07 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2010-11 Villanova Knights OJHL 40 1 5 6 0.150 0.0451 0.0507 0.1027 0.1155
2011-12 St. Michael's Buzzers OJHL 48 12 11 23 0.479 0.1440 0.1556 0.3280 0.3544
2012-13 St. Michael's Buzzers OJHL 55 27 16 43 0.782 0.2349 0.2421 0.5351 0.5516
2013-14 St. Michael's Buzzers OJHL 53 21 27 48 0.906 0.2721 0.2666 0.6200 0.6074
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 Williams D3 NESCAC SR 26 14 6 20 0.769
2016-17 Williams D3 NESCAC JR 26 11 7 18 0.692
2015-16 Williams D3 NESCAC SO 26 7 5 12 0.462
2014-15 Williams D3 NESCAC FR 22 7 6 13 0.591
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.22
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.59
2014-15 · Williams
+168.8% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#23594
Forward overall
#919
Forward born in 1994
#1325
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Jake Wood
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ RPI (0.24 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Judd Peterson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Landon Smith
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.79 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Kevin Irwin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.56 PPG
→ Vermont (0.47 D1 FR PPG)
0.33 Average
NCAAe PPG
A.J. Fossen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.55 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.33 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Alex Porrier
Johnson & Wales · 2009-10
0.654 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Connor May
Adrian · 2018-19
0.783 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Tyler Kulas
Neumann · 2018-19
0.444 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.