IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ryan Rosenberg Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1997-03-31 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Battlefords North Stars SJHL 37 2 11 13 0.351 0.0900 0.0927 0.2644 0.2723
2016-17 Battlefords North Stars SJHL 48 3 14 17 0.354 0.0907 0.0889 0.2665 0.2612
2017-18 Corpus Christi IceRays NAHL 27 1 3 4 0.148 0.0526 0.0490 0.1562 0.1454
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Fredonia D1 SUNYAC SO 14 0 1 1 0.071
2019-20 Fredonia D3 SUNYAC SO 14 0 1 1 0.071
2018-19 Fredonia D1 SUNYAC FR 17 0 0 0 0.000
2018-19 Fredonia D3 SUNYAC FR 17 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

10%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
80%
Age-Out / Club
2%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#23910
Defenseman overall
#2920
Defenseman born in 1997

D1 Comparables

Carter Foguth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Michael Holland
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Adam Papayoanou
Southern Maine · 2016-17
0.192 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Sam Tikka
St. Norbert · 2005-06
0.368 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Connor Koviak
Wisconsin-Eau Claire · 2017-18
0.280 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.