IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Steven Li Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-03-25 Country: China
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Aurora Tigers OJHL 41 5 2 7 0.171 0.0418 0.0418 0.1168 0.1168
2020-21 Haliburton County Huskies OJHL 0 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2021-22 — OJHL 42 1 11 12 0.286 0.0700 0.0709 0.1956 0.1980
2022-23 Mississauga Chargers OJHL 40 3 8 11 0.275 0.0674 0.0648 0.1882 0.1809
2023-24 Mississauga Chargers OJHL 30 2 9 11 0.367 0.0899 0.0817 0.2510 0.2282
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Stevenson D3 MAC — 9 0 1 1 0.111
2024-25 Stevenson D3 MAC — 0 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

20%
NCAA D1
15%
NCAA D2/D3
62%
Age-Out / Club
2%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#47505
Forward overall
#3158
Forward born in 2003
#3490
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Keaton Leininger
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2016-17
0.286 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Tyler Virgoe
SUNY Cortland · 2009-10
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Cashen Naeve
Saint John's · 2024-25
0.440 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.