← New Search ↗ Social Card

Cashen Naeve Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2004-03-17 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Wayzata USHS-MN 15 0 0 0 0.000
2020-21 Wayzata USHS-MN 21 4 5 9 0.429 0.1154 0.1154 0.1041 0.1041
2021-22 Wayzata USHS-MN 27 2 13 15 0.556 0.1496 0.1496 0.1350 0.1350
2022-23 Wisconsin Windigo NAHL 57 3 15 18 0.316 0.1173 0.1217 0.3344 0.3470
2023-24 Wisconsin Windigo NAHL 46 4 8 12 0.261 0.0969 0.0959
2024-25 Wisconsin Windigo NAHL 50 8 18 26 0.520 0.1931 0.1810 0.5506 0.5161
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Saint John's D3 MIAC FR 25 5 6 11 0.440
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.14
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.44
2025-26 · Saint John's
+217.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

22%
NCAA D1
22%
NCAA D2/D3
52%
Age-Out / Club
2%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#7466
Defenseman overall
#1468
Defenseman born in 2004

D1 Comparables

QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.70 PPG
→ Robert Morris (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Norwich · 2016-17
0.577 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Neumann · 2003-04
0.870 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Scholastica · 2008-09
0.643 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.