IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jordan Power Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2001-07-13 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Rockland Nationals CCHL 62 2 32 34 0.548 0.1189 0.1339 0.4243 0.4777
2018-19 Lincoln Stars USHL 58 3 15 18 0.310 0.1830 0.1945 0.9320 0.9904
2019-20 Lincoln Stars USHL 43 4 29 33 0.767 0.4527 0.4527 2.3048 2.3048
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Minnesota D1 BigTen — 37 2 4 6 0.162
2023-24 Minnesota D1 BigTen — 31 1 6 7 0.226
2022-23 Clarkson D1 ECAC JR 37 2 11 13 0.351
2021-22 Clarkson D1 ECAC SO 36 4 9 13 0.361
2020-21 Clarkson D1 ECAC FR 22 1 3 4 0.182
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.16
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.18
2020-21 · Clarkson
+13.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

52%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
48%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#2945
Defenseman overall
#693
Defenseman born in 2001

D1 Comparables

Teemu Kivihalme
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.25 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Luke Shiplo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.22 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.46 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Phil Beaulieu
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Keaton Thompson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Neal Pionk
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Lucas Michaud
Trinity · 2014-15
0.893 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Connor Treacy
SUNY Potsdam · 2002-03
0.960 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Devin Niles
Fitchburg State · 2023-24
1.500 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.