IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Logan Orem Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1997-10-23 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Nashville Jr. Predators NA3HL 44 23 21 44 1.000 0.1255 0.1319 0.3157 0.3318
2016-17 Nashville Jr. Predators NA3HL 42 20 35 55 1.310 0.1643 0.1644 0.4134 0.4136
2017-18 Shreveport Mudbugs NAHL 1 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Johnson & Wales D3 CNE SR 25 1 4 5 0.200
2020-21 Johnson & Wales D3 CNE JR 0 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Johnson & Wales D3 CNE SO 24 3 5 8 0.333
2018-19 Johnson & Wales D3 CNE FR 4 2 0 2 0.500
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.13
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.50
2018-19 · Johnson & Wales
+285.8% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#18905
Forward overall
#847
Forward born in 1997

D1 Comparables

Landon Smith
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.79 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Hynes
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.28 PPG
→ Union (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Dylan Gareau
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Conor Andrle
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Army (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Average
NCAAe PPG
Kenny Gillespie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ RPI (0.20 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Mike Mikulan
Aurora · 2010-11
0.824 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Lukas Lyszyk
Finlandia · 2018-19
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Noah Lafleur
Johnson & Wales · 2022-23
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.