IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Logan Orem Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1997-10-23 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Nashville Jr. Predators NA3HL 44 23 21 44 1.000 0.1205 0.1266 0.3159 0.3320
2016-17 Nashville Jr. Predators NA3HL 42 20 35 55 1.310 0.1578 0.1579 0.4137 0.4139
2017-18 Shreveport Mudbugs NAHL 1 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Johnson & Wales D3 CNE SR 25 1 4 5 0.200
2020-21 Johnson & Wales D3 CNE JR 0 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Johnson & Wales D3 CNE SO 24 3 5 8 0.333
2018-19 Johnson & Wales D3 CNE FR 4 2 0 2 0.500
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.12
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.50
2018-19 · Johnson & Wales
+301.9% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#29025
Forward overall
#1290
Forward born in 1997

D1 Comparables

Erik Baskin
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.44 PPG
→ Air Force (0.66 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Conor Lemirande
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Miami (0.08 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Hynes
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.28 PPG
→ Union (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Zach Szajner
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Dylan Gareau
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Lukas Lyszyk
Finlandia · 2018-19
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Andrew Harley
SUNY Brockport · 2018-19
1.185 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Dominic Skrelja
Salve Regina · 2018-19
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.