← New Search ↗ Social Card

Cameron Hebert Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1999-03-17 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Brockville Braves CCHL 1 0 0 0 0.000
2016-17 Navan Grads CCHL 54 10 12 22 0.407 0.0884 0.0938 0.3152 0.3345
2017-18 Cornwall Colts CCHL 55 16 27 43 0.782 0.1696 0.1713 0.6049 0.6108
2018-19 Johnstown Tomahawks NAHL 58 26 52 78 1.345 0.4941 0.4864 1.4194 1.3973
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 Robert Morris D1 AHA 33 2 5 7 0.212
2020-21 Robert Morris D1 AHA SO 15 3 3 6 0.400
2019-20 Robert Morris D1 AHA FR 18 1 2 3 0.167
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.31
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.17
2019-20 · Robert Morris
-46.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

42%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
12%
Age-Out / Club
45%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#11800
Forward overall
#520
Forward born in 1999

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.95 PPG
→ Union (0.89 D1 FR PPG)
0.53 Elite
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.48 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.90 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.45 D1 FR PPG)
0.50 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.77 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Developing
NCAAe PPG
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.88 PPG
→ Miami (0.46 D1 FR PPG)
0.48 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Wisconsin-Superior · 2000-01
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Stout · 2005-06
1.286 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Saint Mary's (MN) · 2009-10
1.200 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.