← New Search ↗ Social Card

Gabriel Seger Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1999-11-15 Country: Sweden
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Brynäs IF U20 SHL-J20 40 8 6 14 0.350 0.1945 0.2083 0.4663 0.4993
2017-18 Växjö Lakers HC U20 SuperElit 45 12 16 28 0.622 0.2455 0.2507 0.8450 0.8629
2018-19 Houston Bulls NAHL 58 18 52 70 1.207 0.4434 0.4513 1.2739 1.2965
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 Cornell D1 ECAC 35 14 30 44 1.257
2022-23 Cornell D1 ECAC 30 7 23 30 1.000
2021-22 Union D1 ECAC 34 7 14 21 0.618
2020-21 Union D1 ECAC 0 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Union D1 ECAC FR 37 7 15 22 0.595
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.32
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.59
2019-20 · Union
+87.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

60%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
2%
Age-Out / Club
38%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#9934
Forward overall
#449
Forward born in 1999

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.46 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Boston University (0.77 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.24 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.86 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.61 D1 FR PPG)
0.50 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Michigan State (0.37 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Middlebury · 2000-01
1.310 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Saint Anselm · 2000-01
1.375 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Oswego · 2007-08
0.926 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.