← New Search ↗ Social Card

Hugh Larkin Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1999-03-27 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Cowichan Valley Capitals BCHL 48 8 6 14 0.292 0.1124 0.1148 0.4245 0.4334
2018-19 Austin Bruins NAHL 54 20 18 38 0.704 0.2585 0.2548 0.7428 0.7323
2019-20 Austin Bruins NAHL 48 21 25 46 0.958 0.3521 0.3521 1.0115 1.0115
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 UConn D1 HockeyEast 32 3 3 6 0.188
2023-24 Western Michigan D1 NCHC SR 37 5 4 9 0.243
2022-23 Western Michigan D1 NCHC JR 38 6 8 14 0.368
2021-22 Western Michigan D1 NCHC SO 19 3 1 4 0.210
2020-21 Western Michigan D1 NCHC FR 19 1 1 2 0.105
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.17
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.11
2020-21 · Western Michigan
-38.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

30%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
18%
Age-Out / Club
45%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#17009
Forward overall
#813
Forward born in 1999

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Denver (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.51 PPG
→ Cornell (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.85 PPG
→ Miami (0.71 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Wisconsin-Stout · 2018-19
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Westfield State · 2010-11
0.800 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Williams · 2009-10
0.846 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.