IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Luc Salem Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1999-07-09 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 — BCHL 45 1 12 13 0.289 0.1113 0.1152 0.4204 0.4352
2018-19 Maryland Black Bears NAHL 54 2 19 21 0.389 0.1429 0.1429 0.4105 0.4105
2019-20 Amarillo Wranglers NAHL 52 9 27 36 0.692 0.2544 0.2544 0.7307 0.7307
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 St. Lawrence D1 ECAC SR 38 3 5 8 0.210
2022-23 St. Lawrence D1 ECAC JR 36 10 17 27 0.750
2021-22 St. Lawrence D1 ECAC SO 37 2 8 10 0.270
2020-21 St. Lawrence D1 ECAC FR 17 3 7 10 0.588
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.12
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.59
2020-21 · St. Lawrence
+372.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

48%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
22%
Age-Out / Club
25%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#6819
Defenseman overall
#1481
Defenseman born in 1999

D1 Comparables

James Roll
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.22 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Christian Neumann
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ UConn (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Tucker Poolman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.44 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.45 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Dan Molenaar
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Tommy Davis
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Princeton (0.29 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Leo Avakovs
Albertus Magnus · 2017-18
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
John Krapian
Post · 2016-17
0.429 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Kyle Gallegos
Tufts · 2009-10
1.150 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.