IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kendrick Frost Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1999-04-01 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Utica Jr. Comets NCDC 50 18 18 36 0.720 0.2935 0.3046 0.5787 0.6006
2018-19 St. Cloud Norsemen NAHL 53 6 7 13 0.245 0.0901 0.0889 0.2589 0.2554
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Endicott D3 CNE — 16 4 1 5 0.312
2022-23 Army D1 AHA — 11 0 1 1 0.091
2021-22 Army D1 AHA — 21 3 2 5 0.238
2020-21 Army D1 AHA — 0 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Army D1 AHA FR 19 0 2 2 0.105
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.15
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.11
2019-20 · Army
-29.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

18%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
18%
Age-Out / Club
60%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#22780
Forward overall
#1125
Forward born in 1999

D1 Comparables

Ben Ostlie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
William Messa
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Northeastern
0.12 No data
NCAAe PPG
Stanislav Dzakhov
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG
Matthew Hansen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.25 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Tait Aptakin
Worcester State · 2015-16
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Yaroslav Alifanov
Johnson & Wales · 2023-24
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
James Poston
Concordia · 2010-11
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.