icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009-10 | Texas Tornado | NAHL | 29 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 0.207 | 0.0768 | 0.0791 | 0.2191 | 0.2257 |
| 2010-11 | New Mexico Mustangs | NAHL | 52 | 4 | 16 | 20 | 0.385 | 0.1428 | 0.1398 | 0.4072 | 0.3987 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014-15 | Concordia | D3 | MIAC | GR | 22 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 0.182 |
| 2014-15 | Concordia Wisconsin | D3 | — | JR | 22 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 0.182 |
| 2013-14 | Concordia | D3 | MIAC | SR | 8 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 0.500 |
| 2013-14 | Concordia Wisconsin | D3 | — | SO | 8 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 0.500 |
| 2012-13 | Concordia | D3 | MIAC | JR | 15 | 3 | 7 | 10 | 0.667 |
| 2012-13 | Concordia Wisconsin | D3 | — | FR | 15 | 3 | 7 | 10 | 0.667 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.