← New Search ↗ Social Card

Craig McCabe Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1998-03-09 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Ottawa Jr. Senators CCHL 54 5 12 17 0.315 0.0683 0.0690 0.2436 0.2461
2017-18 Ottawa Jr. Senators CCHL 52 7 14 21 0.404 0.0876 0.0840 0.3124 0.2995
2018-19 New Jersey Jr. Titans NAHL 32 2 9 11 0.344 0.1263 0.1179 0.3629 0.3387
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Fredonia D3 SUNYAC SR 23 2 4 6 0.261
2021-22 Fredonia D3 SUNYAC JR 21 3 4 7 0.333
2019-20 Fredonia D1 SUNYAC FR 22 0 4 4 0.182
2019-20 Fredonia D3 SUNYAC FR 22 0 4 4 0.182
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.10
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.18
2019-20 · Fredonia
+84.6% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

32%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
57%
Age-Out / Club
2%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#13357
Defenseman overall
#2173
Defenseman born in 1998

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Amherst · 2008-09
0.636 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2003-04
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Hamline · 2011-12
0.471 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.