IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jamie Hawkrigg Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1988-03-07 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2006-07 King Rebellion OJHL 49 2 25 27 0.551 0.1539 0.1532 0.3802 0.3784
2007-08 King Rebellion OJHL 34 6 15 21 0.618 0.1726 0.1640 0.4262 0.4049
2008-09 King Rebellion OJHL 32 4 13 17 0.531 0.1484 0.1334 0.3666 0.3295
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2012-13 Amherst D3 NESCAC SR 24 2 6 8 0.333
2011-12 Amherst D3 NESCAC JR 27 5 12 17 0.630
2010-11 Amherst D3 NESCAC SO 22 0 6 6 0.273
2009-10 Amherst D3 — FR 22 4 10 14 0.636
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.14
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.64
2009-10 · Amherst
+362.8% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#6571
Defenseman overall
#1067
Defenseman born in 1988
#2250
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Michael Holland
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Carter Foguth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Drew Brevig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Brett Williams
Westfield State · 2021-22
0.296 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Zach Dill
Salem State · 2021-22
1.111 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Michael Kull
SUNY Brockport · 2024-25
0.292 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.