IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Max Klanow Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-03-31 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Wilkes-Barre/Scranton Knights NAHL 49 2 8 10 0.204 0.0725 0.0788 0.2143 0.2328
2019-20 — NAHL 45 3 6 9 0.200 0.0710 0.0710 0.2100 0.2100
2021-22 Hawkesbury Hawks CCHL 47 2 6 8 0.170 0.0369 0.0338 0.1318 0.1206
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 SUNY Potsdam D3 SUNYAC SR 21 4 0 4 0.191
2024-25 SUNY Potsdam D3 SUNYAC JR 25 3 5 8 0.320
2023-24 SUNY Potsdam D3 SUNYAC SO 21 2 3 5 0.238
2022-23 SUNY Potsdam D3 SUNYAC FR 15 0 2 2 0.133
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.04
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.13
2022-23 · SUNY Potsdam
+200.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

15%
NCAA D1
18%
NCAA D2/D3
68%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#53472
Forward overall
#3253
Forward born in 2001
#6171
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Stanislav Dzakhov
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG
Ben Ostlie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
William Messa
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Northeastern
0.12 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Sean Patterson
Wentworth · 2003-04
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Aaron Murray
Stevenson · 2016-17
0.462 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Ethan Osburn
UMass Boston · 2018-19
0.375 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.